ab all-star tribute will be held on sunday, december 2nd. only one will be named cnn hero of the year. that's all for us tonight. "ac 360" starts now. that's all for us tonight. "ac 340" starts now. we begin with mitt romney's attempt at making his now famous 47% remark, 100% less damaging as new strategy, according to cnn's gloria borger, will be in part to quote personalize his economic message. here's how it's playing out. >> this is a campaign about the 100% and over the last several years you've seen greater and greater divisiveness in this country. we had hoped to come back together but instead, you've seen us pull apart and politics has driven us apart in some respects, so my campaign is about the 100% of america, and i'm concerned about them. >> that's mitt romney yesterday

talking latino voters in miami. no doubt that 100% pledge inserted because of the now famous or infamous, depending on how you look at it, video secretly shot at that $50,000 a plate fund-raiser. >> well, there are 47% of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. all right, there are 47% who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has the responsibility to care for them, who believe they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. it's an entitlement. that the government should give it to them and they will vote for this president no matter what. >> that was then. this is now. since the tape bit, mr. romney has taken pains to say he wasn't really talking about those in that 47% who don't pay federal income taxes because they're seniors or serving in the military. he does, however, seem to be talking about welfare recipients and people on food stamps and other forms of government assistance. keeping them honest, though,

he's now making at least one exception for people who fall into that category, people like his parents. >> they came back to the united states and my dad had to get help, financial help, the government helped his family to be able to get on their feet again. by the way, that's the way america works. >> there's also video from back when george romney was running for office and facing charges that he was wealthy and simply out of touch. this is mitt romney's mother, lenore, back in 1962. >> you know, we've only owned our home for the last four years. he was a refugee from mexico. he was on relief, welfare relief for the first years of his life, but this great country gave him opportunities. >> mitt romney's mom talking about how her husband's family was on government relief when he was a child. so will disclosures like that, governor romney's own father benefited from a program that the son has characterized as populated by quote, victims,

help the romney campaign reboot, or will it further knock him off message? mark mckinnen is a conservative who has been sharply critical of mitt romney on this issue and also is a former top campaign advisor to george w. bush and john mccain, currently writes for the daily beast. also with us, chief political analyst gloria borger and alice stewart former spokesman for the santorum and bachman 2012 presidential campaigns. mark, let's start with you. right after the romney fund-raising tape came out, you said you weren't too happy with what the campaign was revealing about mitt romney. you've seen how he's responded over the past few days, talking about his own family's experience with government assistance, for example, telling people he wants to represent the 100%. are you happy with the way he's addressed the situation? >> well, wolf, it's an improvement. it's been 48 hours now without a gaffe or without another new tape so that's a good sign. the thing that strikes me that's interesting about the campaign is that romney's goal in this

campaign was to make it a referendum on obama. obama's goal was to make it a choice and oddly now it's become a referendum on romney. all the focus now is on romney and who he is. now, the upside for that for romney is he has an opportunity to reveal his vision, his goals, his policies in a way that we really haven't heard before because i think now he realizes and the campaign realizes that it can't just be a referendum on obama, that he now has to fill in the story, and that's got to be part of their strategy now. >> gloria, this talk about his father just doesn't feel like damage control. it seems like the latest example of something they've tried to do at the conventions to make the governor seem more relatable, like someone who isn't totally insulated from the problems of ordinary people. doesn't it? >> yeah. i mean, that's their real problem, and if you look at the numbers, wolf, it's kind of unsustainable for them. they have to turn this around, which is that by a three-to-one margin according to some polls, voters believe that president

obama better understands the problems of ordinary americans, so people are referring to themselves. unless people believe that you understand where they're coming from, they're not going to trust you to become the next president of the united states, which is why we hear mitt romney now talking about the early economic struggles of his father, which is why we heard him during the convention talk about more of his personal life, more of his faith, more of who he is, trying to open himself up a little bit. but of course, now it comes in the context of complete damage control, which makes it suspect. >> alice, the likability is certainly a concern for the romney campaign. he's actually under water in some polls as unfavorable numbers are actually higher than his favorable numbers, and that's basically unprecedented for a presidential candidate at this point in the race. here's the question. is there really enough time to reverse the trend? >> oh, there certainly is.

we have a little less than 50 days to go but what we're seeing in the past few days is exactly what the obama campaign wants. they want a discussion and debate on class warfare as opposed to looking exactly at his record, and what we're seeing over the past few days is romney's had the opportunity to show that he is for 100% of americans, whereas president obama, as we've seen, is for redistribution of wealth, spreading the wealth and giving everyone a shot, and we've seen the audio clip from the president saying that the trick of government is to be able to pool resources in order to sustain a redistribution of wealth. what he's planning to do is further create another generation of government, we have 47 million peoe on food stamps, whereas governor romney, he wants to take people off government dependency and allow them to thrive in the free market system. >> mark, we have a new cnn poll from nevada today. there are new nbc/"wall street

journal"/maris numbers in iowa, colorado, advantages for the president in all those states. all along you have been saying based on your experience in the bush campaign look, you can't write off the romney campaign in september. do you still feel that way? >> well, i think the tape was very damaging. i think that's what polls are reflecting. i remember when we had what we call black september in 2000, we came out of the convention, had some bad weeks, we were down three points and then we turned it around in the debates. it was a big opportunity in the debates. jimmy carter was up four points at this same time in 1980, so it's absolutely possible. 50 days is a lifetime in a campaign. these couple news cycles a few days from now will seem like ancient history. >> gloria, one of the things we did see today, that we have seen for a few days now in the polls that ask voters who was the best candidate to manage the economy. president obama was actually tied or had a slight edge on that question. the romney campaign is seeing these numbers, they're making some changes, aren't they? >> well, right.

i mean, they see that that's a real possible for them. the entire rationale for mitt romney's candidacy is that he's got the business experience to fix the economy. that's how he has portrayed himself. the problem that they're running into now is that when you look at the polls, americans are more optimistic about where the economy is going to be a year from now, whether they're going to be better off. they're still not above 50% but they're about twice as optimistic as they were a year ago. so mitt romney has a tougher time making his case if people are a little bit more optimistic about how they're feeling about their own economic situation. so what the romney campaign's trying to do, in my discussions with them, is they're trying to personalize this, to say you know what, here's exactly how i can fix this, here's how your health care will be more expensive, here's how i'm going to open domestic oil production and lower gas prices for you, so they're trying to take it from a

macro level to a more micro level so that people can relate to their solutions for the economy, wolf, and they haven't ruled out doing some kind of domestic policy speech to talk to voters directly. >> might be smart to do that. gloria borger, mark mckinnen, alice stewart, guys, thanks very much. let us know what you think. we're on facebook, follow me on twitter,@wolfblitzer. ahead, one of voters top concerns, immigration. president obama and mitt romney face tough questions at a town hall held by univision. how crucial will the latino vote be in november? that's next.

tonight we continue our focus on issues 2012. we polled registered voters to identify their top foreign policy concerns. we asked what keeps them up at night. syria was their number five concern. afghanistan was four. china was three. tonight, the number two foreign policy concern, immigration. over the past two days in miami, president obama and mitt romney took part in a town hall style event sponsored by univision, the spanish speaking television network. immigration was a big topic. latino voters are expected to play a crucial role in the election. cnn's chief national correspondent john king is

digging deeper. john? >> wolf, one reason we keep a close eye on this issue is we know it's important to all voters but it has a special appeal among latino voters who are critical in this presidential election. let's take a look at how they can matter. we have seen both candidates try to increase their outreach lately. in many swing states the latino population will be critical. nevada, more than 17% of the population is latino. colorado, more than 13%. the state of florida, it's closing in on 20%, above 19% in this election, and even in a state like ohio, where it's only 2.5% of the population, in a 50/50 race, that can matter. it could be a potential swing population in many of the key battleground states. now, what's interesting, if you don't hear as much about the illegal immigration issue per se as many complaints right now, and that's in part because the numbers are down a little bit. first let's look at a little history. this is the u.s. hispanic population by place of birth. if you go back to 1970, nearly 9 in 10 latinos, hispanics living in the united states were born in the united states. only 14% came from outside of the united states. this is both legal and illegal immigrants. those foreign born.

look at now. 63% born in the united states, 37% again, that's legal and illegal immigrants coming from outside the united states. that's been an interesting change in the last 30 plus, 40 years. here's an interesting figure. you hear a lot of complaints in the border states of course but if you go back through recent years, illegal immigration relatively static in terms of the numbers. according to the department of homeland security, 10.5 million came into the united states in 2005. in 2010 it was 11.6. 2011, 11.5. so still a high number, many would say that's way too high, but a relatively flat line, if you will, on the illegal immigration problem and again, if you go to some border states, they would call it a crisis. wolf? >> attitudes towards immigrants are changing as well, right? >> they are changing a bit. let's take a look at the numbers. let me turn off the telestrator and get this out of the way. we'll move to a battleground state. we will pull this number out of nevada. look at this question here. this is asked by gallup, what

level should immigration be at. again, this is immigration. not illegal or legal. if you look at this present level dark green, increase to brighter green, decreased is the yellow. decreased, look at back in the mid '90s, 65%, spiked again here. now decreased is down to 35%. 42% of the american people say keep it right about where it is and 21% favor increase. you do see some spikes, especially back here in the '90s, and right here, it's a little less intense, if you will, a little less pressure on the government and politicians to decrease immigration at the moment. >> john, thanks very much. joining me now, antonio vee ra gos villaraigosa, national co-chair for the obama for america campaign. also joining us, the former u.s. secretary of commerce, carlos gutierrez, who co-chairs mitt romney's hispanic steering committee. gentlemen, thanks very much for joining us. mayor villaraigosa, i will start with you. the president participating in a discussion today in the spanish language network univision, was pressed pretty hard by the anchor, jorge ramos on why he didn't achieve comprehensive immigration reform in his first term. i want to play a little clip of that exchange and let you respond. listen to this.

>> translator: may 28th, 2008, we had a conversation in denver, colorado. you told me the following, and i want to quote you. what i can guarantee is that we will have in the first year an immigration bill that i strongly support. >> i confess i did not expect and so i'm happy to take responsibility for being naive here, is that republicans who had previously supported comprehensive immigration reform, my opponent in 2008, who had been a champion of it, and who attended these meetings, suddenly would walk away. that's what i did not anticipate. >> mr. mayor, we know the president enjoys a wide lead among hispanic voters out there but clearly, there are some who feel he didn't do enough for them in his first term and they're holding him responsible for it despite his argument that the republicans obstructed him on the issue. here's the question. do his latino critics have a fair point? >> no. first of all, he took

responsibility, he said look, i made a promise, i didn't realize that the republicans would walk away from the bipartisan deal that you need to address something of this magnitude. he's certainly not running away from what he said, but i think the vast majority of latinos in the last poll i saw, it's something like 68% of them support the president, because they know he supports comprehensive immigration reform, and mr. romney supports the self-deportation of 11 million people. they know he supports the dream act, he did deferred action. they know mr. romney does not, that he's highlighted his support for the alabama and arizona laws as models for the nation. they know that he's helped to bring out 2 million people -- 2 million latinos out of poverty, 150,000 latinos have

scholarships because -- loans because of his work. and 9 until latinos will have health care because of the affordable care act. that's why so many people, latinos, do support the president and don't support mr. romney. there are a small number that are still focused on the fact that we weren't able to get a deal. we ought to all work together to get that deal and move forward. >> secretary gutierrez, your candidate, governor romney, spoke to univision yesterday. he appeared to try to soften his stance on illegal immigration to a certain degree. listen to this. >> we're not going to round up people around the country and deport them. that's not -- i said during my primary campaign, time and again, we're not going to round up 12 million people. that includes the kids and the parents, and have everyone deported. our system isn't to deport people. we need to provide a long-term solution. >> it's widely known that the governor needs to do better with latino voters if he's going to win. he said as much in that secret fund-raiser recording that emerged this week but is this softening of the rhetoric particularly at this late stage

in the campaign, mr. secretary, going to be enough? >> well, look, the governor is saying what he believes and what he feels. he's not the kind of man that would round up 12 million people and deport them. i think hispanics are appropriately outraged and many who i've talked to, because they feel like they've been taken for a ride, and they've been used only when their vote is needed, and where they should be really outraged is in the results. you know, over 10% unemployment for more than 50 months, three million hispanics looking for work. hispanic teenagers, 30% unemployment and then, 2 million more hispanics in poverty. that's where the threat of these redistributionist policies get you. that's what we should be talking about. do we want a redistributionist country or do we want a country fueled by free enterprise,

innovation, entrepreneurship, individual empowerment? that's the big question of this election, wolf. >> it's a big question indeed. very quickly, mr. mayor, the governor has criticized president obama for ordering his administration not to deport children who are in the country illegally saying it was a political move. was it strictly a political move? >> absolutely not. you can't have it both ways. he says he doesn't want to mass deport 11 million people, but he wants to make conditions so miserable, so intolerable, so oppressive that they self-deport. no country in the world has ever deported 12 million people. the fact of the matter is, the president did the right thing, that reflected his values, reflected the fact that these kids are going to contribute mightily to the nation. what i would hope is, and i've said this before, that we ought to work on a bipartisan basis to pass comprehensive immigration reform now. get it out of the campaign. get it out of the discussion. let's work together now to do that. >> don't hold your breath.

that's not going to happen. >> i agree with you -- sorry? >> i was going to say, unfortunately we're out of time. we got to leave it right there. but let's continue this conversation down the road. i don't expect -- i don't think anyone expects comprehensive immigration reform about to pass before the election. >> we want bipartisan sensible immigration reform which the governor said today. >> all right. gentlemen, thanks very much. mayor villaraigosa, secretary gutierrez, appreciate it. up next, the extraordinary claim that some are making about this man, the blind sheikh who masterminded the first world trade center attack. president obama, some say, is weighing a deal to cut him loose. i will ask a top accuser and leading lawmaker where's the evidence? "keeping them honest." otos, bue loves the access to tom'sos, bue personal information. oscar's an identity thief who used tom's personal info to buy new teeth and a new car, and stuck tom with the $57,000 bill.

[tires squeal] now meet carl who works from the coffee shop and uses the free wi-fi. marie works from there too. she's an identity thief who used a small device to grab his wi-fi signal, then stole enough personal information to hijack and drain his bank accounts. every year, millions of americans learn all it may take to devastate your life is a little personal information in the wrong hands. this is identity theft and no one helps stop it better than lifelock. lifelock offers the most comprehensive identity theft protection, period. ordinary credit monitoring services may take 30 days to alert you. lifelock's 24/7 proactive protection would have alerted tom as soon as they noticed an attack within their network, before it was too late. and lifelock's bank account takeover alerts could have notified carl in time to help him protect his money. lifelock protects your social security number, money, credit, even the equity in your home. while identity theft can't be completely stopped, no one

protects you better than lifelock, and lifelock stands behind that with the power of their $1 million service guarantee. you have so much to protect and nothing to lose when you call lifelock right now and try 60 days of identity theft protection risk-free. 60 days risk-free. use promo code: be secure order now and get this document shredder, a $29 value free. [♪...] call or go online now. [♪...] @p@p

keeping them honest right now, in the common sense idea that if you're going to make a bold statement, you better have the goods to back it up. extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. so tonight, here's the extraordinary claim.

that as a result of the rioting that swept egypt and the rest of the arab world, the obama administration is either thinking about, actively negotiating or has already reached a deal to let a notorious mastermind of terror go free. the man convicted of plotting the 1993 world trade center bombing that killed six people and served as the inspiration for the 9/11 attacks, a man who was in many ways the osama bin laden of his times. this man, the shaikh abdul rahman, the blind shaikh, as he's called, now serving a life sentence in a north carolina federal prison. according to an article in today's "new york post" the administration may let him go as a good will gesture to egyptians.

the paper sites unnamed officials and a former blind sheikh prosecutor saying he thinks and i'm quoting now, i believe there may already be a nod and a wink agreement in place. he offers no evidence though, to support that belief. the story is getting wide play as well out there on the blogosphere and among congressional republicans, including congressman peter king, who you will hear from shortly. he and others writing the attorney general, eric holder, and the secretary of state, hillary clinton, saying this. the release of abdel rahman or any terrorist who plots to kill innocent americans would be seen for what it is, a sign of weakness and a lack of resolve by the united states and its president. both the justice department and the national security council have issued flat out denials. not true, they say. not depending, necessarily -- not relying on what they say, according to these critics, but despite having zero supporting evidence to the contrary, a flat denial isn't good enough for some. as we mentioned, the new york congressman peter king. i spoke with the congressman earlier. joining us now from capitol hill, peter king. he's the chairman of the house homeland security committee. mr. chairman, thanks very much. >> you're welcome. >> you've caused quite a stir by

suggesting that the obama administration is considering releasing the so-called blind sheikh, sheikh omar abdel rahman who was responsible for the initial world trade center bombing back in the early '90s. they flatly denied that. what evidence do you have that they may be considering this request? >> first, wolf, they have not flatly denied it but let me say the basis for the letter, i sent it along with seven other senior house chairmen, committee chairmen and subcommittee chairmen because several months ago, president morsi in his inaugural address said he wanted the blind sheikh released to egyptian custody. then over the last several months, especially the last few weeks, i know my staff has contact with federal law enforcement saying questions are being asked if the sheikh were to be released or transferred, what the procedures would be. also, over the last several months, when i have had contact with different cabinet officials, we don't get a definite no. so the eight of us decided to send this letter to attorney general holder and secretary clinton and what the state department said yesterday, they

said there is no plan. that's playing word games a bit. all they have to say is that the blind sheikh is going to die in an american jail. don't say there's no plan, because that means there could be a plan tomorrow. they also said there's been no recent contact with high level egyptian officials on this issue. does that mean that there's contact with lower level officials or there was contact until recently? and then the justice department put a statement out saying that he will remain in prison but they didn't say what prison because the egyptians are saying we should transfer him from federal prison in the united states to an egyptian prison. so all they have to do, they can end this tomorrow. this story could be ended tomorrow if they put out a one-sentence statement saying that not only is he not going to beeleased but he will die in an american prison. >> let me put up on the screen, show the viewers the statements that the obama administration so far have released. has released. this from justice department spokesman dean boyd, i will put it up. the assertion that the blind sheikh may be transferred to egypt is utter garbage.

the blind sheikh is not being transferred to egypt, nor is he being released. he is serving a life sentence in federal prison. suggestions that there are discussions to transfer or release him are absolute garbage and completely false. then a separate statement from the national security council spokesman, tommy vietor, who said this. the blind sheikh is going to serve out his life sentence, there are no discussions about transferring him. these reports are wrong. and then finally, as you say, the state department issued this statement, i'll play it for you once again. listen to this. >> let me say as clearly as i can, there is no plan to release the blind sheikh. there is no plan. to my knowledge, we have not been approached about it recently by any senior egyptians. >> all right. you got three statements from the justice department, the national security council and the state department saying it's not happening. why do you suspect it still might be happening? >> let's focus on the state department statement. that does not say it's not going

to happen. that was not unequivocal. they said there is no plan and to the best of her knowledge there has been no recent contact with the egyptian government. does that mean there was prior contact with the egyptian government, that was not so recent? that was certainly a very equivocal type answer. so if we get a clear unequivocal statement, not somebody saying it's garbage or anything else, we get the attorney general, secretary of state, to say emphatically that he will never, ever be released from an american prison and he will die in prison, that's a different story. >> so when the spokesman for the national security council says, and i will put it up one more time, the spokesman for the national security council says the blind sheikh is going to serve out his life sentence, that seems like a pretty flat -- firm statement to me. >> well, he didn't say he's serving it out in an american prison. the justice department did but the national security council didn't. remember, president morsi is saying transfer him to egypt and they will put him in an egyptian prison for life. there's a difference. he didn't say he's not going to be transferred. he said he's going --

>> he did go on to say, mr. chairman, he did go on to say there are no discussions about transferring him, these reports are wrong. >> now, the state department yesterday said they don't have any knowledge of any recent discussions. so that implies that there were discussions. so again, they better get their act together. >> one final question. the initial information that you have suggesting that there may be discussions under way, some consideration to releasing the blind sheikh, can you share with us where you're getting this information? >> i would just say there are federal law enforcement officials who came to my committee, my committee staff, they have spoken with us. others have had several similar conversations and these are people who have no partisan agenda at all. they came to us, came to my committee staff because of their concern. >> peter king's the chairman of the house homeland security committee. mr. chairman, thanks very much for coming in. >> wolf, thank you. coming up, breaking news. brand new details about the attack on the u.s. consulate in libya that left ambassador chris stevens and three others dead. what libya is saying about whether the attack was

preplanned. that's next. matt's brakes didn't sound right... ...so i brought my car to mike at meineke...

...and we inspected his brakes for free. -free is good. -free is very good. [ male announcer ] now get 50% off brake pads and shoes at meineke. breaking news. new information about the attacks that killed four americans in libya. the libyans saying the attack was preplanned. that differs entirely from what the u.s. is saying. details, next.

some breaking news to tell you about right now. new reporting out of libya on killing of the ambassador to libya and three others last week in benghazi. in the months before he died, ambassador stevens talked about what he called the never-ending security threats in benghazi. a source familiar with ambassador stevens' thinking telling us the ambassador specifically mentioned the rise in islamic extremism, the

growing al qaeda presence in libya and said he was on an al qaeda hit list. today the secretary of state, hillary clinton was asked about that notion. >> i have absolutely no information or reason to believe that there is any basis for that. >> her remarks notwithstanding, we think our reporting is solid and our own people have been digging deeper, including arwa damon, has been in benghazi with the breaking news and also elise labbot in washington. arwa, there is still a disagreement between the libyan and u.s. governments on whether the attacks were replanned. you interviewed the libyan prime minister earlier today. what can you tell us? >> the prime minister was telling us they do believe this was a preplanned attack, this was not a spontaneous event that did take place. they are saying so far, eight people are in custody who were directly linked to this attack and that they are in pursuit of others, especially in pursuit of the leadership.

however, those individuals are a -- are not linked to one particular group, rather they are something of a coalition of individuals with different affiliati affiliations, all of them having this extremist vein running within them but they are individuals who are loosely banded together. the government in hot pursuit at this time, telling us they are determined to bring them to justice. >> arwa, is there anyone there saying the attack could have been prevented? >> at this point in time, the libyan government, the prime minister himself is saying no, this could not have been prevented at this stage. but some libyan military officials that we have been talking to have been saying for quite some time now they've been speaking with u.s. officials in libya about this rising threat from islamist extremists. this attack was not an isolated

incident. >> elise, u.s. government officials are conceding it was, in fact, a terrorist attack, but not saying it was preplanned, is that right? >> that's right, wolf. what they are saying, they didn't have any "actionable intelligence" that the consulate was indeed being targeted or diplomats were indeed being targeted. that's very different than saying there was no chatter out there. that they weren't aware of the threat. they say it wasn't preplanned, but the level of sophistication and the number of people who were there heavily armed would cause one to think there was some kind of coordination. what u.s. officials think maybe there wasn't necessarily plan to attack the consulate on any particular day but that there were a group of extremists looking for a target of opportunity. they saw something going on at the embassy and they were ready to go and they went for it, wolf. >> arwa, there's an investigation going on in libya in the wake of the attack, the prime minister saying he's

determined to bringing those responsible to justice. but how easy of a task is that in a country like libya right now? >> it most certainly is not easy at all, wolf. these individual have a number of places they can seek safe haven. in fact, the u.s. has been monitoring quite a few of these locations, especially in the eastern part of the country for quite some time now. that was something the prime minister brought up as well, talking about how difficult it was going to be to bring these individuals to justice, to actually bring them in. also fully aware of the necessity of accomplishing just that, because this government does at the end of the day have to establish its own credibility within its own nation but also when it comes to its standing in the international community as well. important to also mention here, wolf, that the prime minister also said, however, that these groups at this point i time are showing no indication having any sort of affiliation with al qaeda. that is the individuals who carried out this assault against

the u.s. consulate, very much a home grown libyan movement at this point. >> and elise, as far as security at the compound in libya was concern, we've heard varying accounts, we've heard from a number of officials that security at the compound was not adequate. fran townsend told us the ambassador steven arrived for a meeting with her at a hotel in tripoli and had no security detail with him at all inside the hotel. you're hearing a very different account from state department officials that you're talking to. what are you hearing? >> wolf, we're hearing a couple of thing. first of all, the officials are saying just because the detail of ambassador stevens in tripoli wasn't visible doesn't mean it wasn't there. when we're talking about the consulate in tripoli -- in benghazi, excuse me, officials say that in the wake -- in the leadup to this 9/11 attack, and arwa just mentioned these previous attacks and including the attack on the consulate, the state department made increased

enharassments to improve security on the compound, more barriers, more cameras, additional armed guards. in addition, ambassador stevens had two armed guards in addition to three others and several militias on the compound, and what officials are saying is listen, we were adding improvements to this security based on those previous attacks which weren't very large, but they say they couldn't have foreseen, wolf, the kind of onslaught that happened on 9/11 and they don't know if they could have done anything to prevent it. >> elise, arwa, thanks very much. just ahead, we show you where a new wave of anti-american protest is breaking.

today, cnn revealed the top ten heroes of 2012. each will receive $50,000 plus a shot at being chosen cnn hero of the year. cnn has been honoring every day heroes for six years running. your nominations led us to these remarkable people whose extraordinary efforts are helping to change the world. tonight, we want to check in with one of last year's top ten heros to see how the award has changed her life. her name is diane lattaker. a chicago grandmother who has seen street violence claim too many young lives. she took action and created a refuge called kids off the block. it gives young people in her south side neighborhood of roseland a safe place to go and help with job and computer

skills. this 2011 top ten hero has helped more than 1,500 kids and her dreams have only gotten bigger. here is what she told us. >> since becoming a cnn hero, it's been the most exciting time of my life. my community came together behind kids off the block after being announced as a cnn hero. i was honored but i felt more honored to be from this community. for once, i really did, because of the people who never thought they would see someone from roseland at that level and cnn opened up an avenue for me to be able to get into lives. you are welcome to come. we're right there. you know where we're at? you're welcome to come. it was phenomenal. the response is continuing to today. i have people from all over the country who call me, who e-mail me, how can we help? what can we do? the hope for the years to come

is to change this block. no, literally, to change this whole block. to be able to buy these houses, and these vacant lots that we have on this block and change them into houses of help. that's my goal, that's my vision, that's what i'm working on now and i believe it. cnn made me believe a lot of things can happen, because if a grandmother from the urban setting of roseland can make it to l.a. to cnn, everything is possible. and that's what i tell these young people. everything is possible. >> like diane, this year's top ten heroes will see doors open. now through november 28th, vote for your favorite hero at cnnheroes.com or from your mobile device, and cast as many as ten votes each day so get busy. ahead, my turn at the "ridiculist."

payback time, but first a 360 bulletin. wolf, a mile steen for troops fighting america's longest war. tonight, the last of the 30,000 extra forces, the so-called surge troops, out of afghanistan. this ends the three-year experiment, leaving about 68,000 american fighting men and women still in country, many until 2014. more than 230 people killed in syria today, at least 55 died when government warplanes hit a gas station, setting off a massive explosion. shell fire and gunshots rang out in aleppo and other cities. meanwhile, more than 60 countries, including the u.s. are considering new economic sanctions against syria. more fallout from the anti islam film, a pakistani teacher led 100 school children in a chant of death to america. there have been protested in more than 20 countries. here at home, sam mullet sr., the leader of a

break-away amish community and 15 followers were convicted of 15 counts of hate crimes. they cut the beards of men and hair of amish women to left his group. and according to reports, an 80-year-old spanish woman who botched an effort to restore a painting of jesus wants a share of the money the church is charging visitors to look at her work. it's now known as "behold the monkey." time for the shot. if you stumble across karaoke in your supermarket, what would you expect to hear? we're betting you wouldn't expect this. ♪ and i will always love you ♪ i will always love you ♪ i will always love you

>> wow. i didn't see that coming. did you? >> no, she knocked that whitney houston classic out of the park. we found it on youtube. it was shot in the philippines. amazing, wasn't it? >> that was totally impressive. who knows where we'll see her nextmaybe "american idol." you never know. >> i would recommend it for sure. isha, thank you. here is something i'm looking forward to. if you are a regular viewer of annerson's "ridiculist," he has had some fun at my expense over the years. but guess what? he's not here tonight. it's my turn. the "ridiculist, blitzer style," that's next. 0ñ@ñfñ

time now for the "ridiculist." tonight, i can do whatever i want as guest host. so i'm adding anderson cooper. i don't know if you've noticed but i recently started wearing these new glasses, and from the reaction that this got out there on the blogs, on twitter, you'd think i'd shown up with an "i heart the situation room" tattooed on my face. i was particularly interested to hear anderson's reaction here on the "ridiculist." listen to this. >> is it just me, or is there something different about wolf blitzer? i can't quite put my finger on it. did he get a haircut or something? has he been working out? there's just, i don't know, let me put my glasses on. there's just something -- oh, you know what? i think i know what it is.

it would seem that mr. wolf blitzer got himself some new glasses. i don't know, perhaps he saw someone wearing them, liked them and decided to pick up a pair for himself. i wonder where he could have possibly gotten that idea. now, i don't want to accuse wolf blitzer of going all single white female on me, but these glasses, they're kind of my thing. >> you can see when two undeniably hunk-tastic men like us work together, a rivalry is inevitably going to arise. yes, anderson may have gotten the glasses first and yes, his eyes may be ever so slightly steelier shade of blue than my own but i would like to point out that there is one area in which i am clearly better than anderson and that area is this. keeping composure when certain kinds of words come up. >> they saw an actual thespian, actually thespian -- >> they should thank their lucky

stars it wasn't depar-two. sorry. all right. sorry. [ laughter ] >> by the way, a cup of that is going to cost you. if you're the adventurous type or you just like to splurge on crap -- [ laughter ] >> the tap from a pussywillow branch. >> sorry. >> this is where i can easily surpass anderson cooper. go ahead, put whatever they want in a teleprompter and i will say it without laughing, without flinching, maybe even without even blinking. here we go. all right. here we go. the pussywillows blowing in the